|
November
11-12, 1999
Washington, DC
Findings, Considerations and Recommendations
Findings
- Corruption
remains a serious problem in all nations, affecting all
parts of society. While some progress has been made, much
more needs to be done if lasting progress is to be accomplished;
- Corruption
has many damaging aspects, including on political and economic
competition;
- Corruption
is a national and transnational problem and to address it
requires national action and collective, multilateral action
as well;
- The
Inter-American Convention against Corruption is an important
and innovative multilateral instrument for addressing the
issue of corruption in the Western Hemisphere;
- All
countries should sign, ratify and fully implement the Convention;
- The
ratification of the Convention and enactment of laws are
not sufficient; steps must be taken to ensure their real
application and enforcement;
- Different
models for multilateral cooperation have been developed,
both inside and outside of the region, that provide valuable
principles and practices consistent with international law
that are relevant to the fight against corruption;
- Unilateral
assessments are not constructive. Multilateral approaches
are preferable; these should be based on consent, mutual
respect and the general principles of international law;
- Notwithstanding
the absence of ratification of the Convention by some states,
there are other international obligations relevant to the
issue of corruption, such as international human rights
norms and agreements on financial cooperation;
- Civil
society and the private sector have a central role to play
in the struggle against corruption and in promoting transparency
and integrity;
- Freedom
of expression has a critical part in the struggle against
corruption;
- Regular
and timely publication of information as well as a right
of access to information are critical tools for combating
corruption. Regular use of the Internet and other mediums
can play a valuable role.
- There
is a need for effective coordination among the various multilateral
efforts to combat corruption being undertaken by the OAS,
OECD, COE, IMF, World Bank, IDB, U.N., etc. In their evaluation
of states’ anti-corruption reform efforts, multilateral
organizations should take the progress achieved into consideration;
Considerations
for Successful Multilateral Cooperation
- Successful
efforts to promote compliance with multilateral agreements
require cooperation and commitment from the nations involved,
including clear goals and a comprehensive strategy;
- There
should be flexibility in developing an approach and it should
be tailored to the unique needs of the region, each nation,
and the subject matter;
- All
members of such a multilateral group must participate as
peers;
- Full
participation should be contingent upon acceptance of the
international obligations involved;
- Discussions
should be constructive and actions taken by the group must
strengthen the process and not be punitive or vindictive;
- Decisions
should be arrived at through consensus and all procedures
should be viewed as being fair and universally applied.
There is an important role to be played by objective, fair
and technically sound expertise;
- There
must be a careful balance between confidentiality and transparency;
- There
should be the fullest possible involvement of civil society
and the private sector;
- Multilateral
organisms such as the World Bank, OAS, IDB, and bilateral
donors should provide technical and financial assistance
necessary for countries to achieve full implementation of
the Convention.
Recommendations
- All
member states of the OAS should promptly sign, ratify, and
fully and effectively implement and enforce the Convention.
All member states of the OAS should develop programs designed
to raise public awareness of the impact of corruption and
to increase the participation of civil society and the private
sector in promoting probity and public ethics. The OAS should
promote these objectives.
- OAS
member states should promote multilateral cooperation in
the fight against corruption. States parties of the Convention
should create a multilateral monitoring mechanism to promote
implementation and enforcement of the Convention. The mechanism
should draw on models in the hemisphere and beyond, taking
into account the considerations above, including participation
on an equal footing by all state parties to the Convention.
- The
functions of this mechanism would include the exchange of
information, the development of technical cooperation, and
the conduct of regular evaluations of the parties’ effective
implementation of the Convention, through a peer review
process. Evaluation teams should be composed of experts
proposed by state parties to the Convention and should perform
in a fair, objective and technically sound fashion.
- The
mechanism should operate on a consensus basis with the fullest
respect for all participants. The evaluation of implementation
and enforcement should be fair and objective.
- Parties
to the Convention should create a permanent secretariat
with technically qualified staff and adequate budget.
- The
evaluation of compliance should be open and transparent
taking into account legitimate needs for confidentiality.
- Adequate
procedures of consultation with the private sector and civil
society should be devised and implemented in order to ensure
appropriate input and communication.
- Progress
should be reported annually to the OAS General Assembly
and to the public.
- Multilateral
organizations such as the World Bank, OAS, and the IDB,
as well as bilateral donors, should provide technical and
financial assistance necessary for countries to achieve
these objectives.
Participants
(in order of presentation):
Claudio
Grossman, Dean of American University Washington College
of Law and Vice President, Inter-American Human Rights Commission
(Chile).
Daniel
Kaufmann, Division Manager, World Bank (Chile).
Marcus
Faro de Castro, Chair of the Department of Political Science
and International Relations at the University of Brasilia
(Brazil).
Roberto
MacLean, former Justice of the Supreme Court of Perú (Perú).
Michael
Davies, Canadian Council for International Business (Canada).
Lucinda
Low, Member, Council of the Inter-American Bar Association
(US).
Raul
Vinueza, Professor of Law, University of Buenos Aires
(Argentina).
Gustavo
Zafra, Dean of the Universidad Javeriana of Colombia (Colombia).
Ambassador
Beatriz Ramacciotti, Permanent Representative of Perú
to the OAS and Chair of the OAS Working Group on Probity and
Public Ethics (Perú).
Jorge
García-González, Director, OAS Department of Legal Cooperation
(Colombia).
Selma
Estrada, Director, Honduran Office of Administrative Probity
(Honduras).
Eduardo
Roche Lander, Comptroller General of Venezuela (Venezuela).
Roberto
de Michele, Poder Ciudadano (Argentina).
Luis
Carlos Ugalde, Member, Transparencia Mexicana and Chief
of Staff of the Mexican Embassy (Mexico).
Ambassador
Carlos Portales, Permanent Representative of Chile to
the OAS (Chile).
Calvin
Wilson, Executive Director, Caribbean Financial Action
Task Force (Trinidad and Tobago).
Victoria
Figge, former Director, Panamanian Financial Analysis
Unit (Panama).
Ambassador
Miguel Ruiz Cabañas, General Director for North American
Affairs, Mexican Foreign Ministry (Mexico).
Mark
Pieth, Chair, OECD Working Group on Bribery (Switzerland).
Ambassador
Roberto Casellas, Advisor, International Affairs, SECODAM
(Mexico).
Peter
Csonka, Division of Crime Problems, Council of Europe
(Hungary).
Nancy
Zucker Boswell, Managing Director of TI-USA (US).
Jennifer
McCoy, Director, Latin American and Caribbean Program,
Carter Center (US).
Fried
van Hoof, Chairman, Netherlands Institute of Human Rights
and Professor, Utrecht University (Holland).
Herman
Schwartz, Professor, Washington College of Law (US).
Stanley
Morris, former Director, U.S. Treasury Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network (US).
Original
available at http://www.transparency-usa.org/Recommend.htm
|